Tag Archive for: general terms

Welcome to our latest Market Watch update, where we bring you the latest insights and developments in the sea and air freight industries. As we transitioned into April 2024, promising signs emerged for Panama Canal transit, with increased daily allowances set to alleviate congestion and improve transit times. We also cover the stabilization of spot rates on the Asia-to-North America route, the impact of dense fog in key Asian ports, and the complexities of securing fixed-rate contracts for 2024-2025. Don’t miss the opportunity to optimize your logistics strategy — reach out to us today for more information.

In a volatile rate environment, having a partner with a robust Control Tower platform and end-to-end supply chain visibility software makes all the difference between reacting to disruption and staying ahead of it.

CAPTAIN CONTROL TOWER

Quantify your exposure in 20 minutes

Our trade strategists run your last 90 days of entries through Captain to surface refund eligibility, Section 232 traps and PNTR risk.

EXPLORE CAPTAIN

Ocean Freight: Asia to North America

After a turbulent start to 2024, the Asia-to-North America trade lane showed signs of stabilization heading into April — though the environment remained far from calm, with new pressures already building on the horizon.

Spot Rate Stabilization — With Caveats

Spot rates stabilized to approximately half of their late-January highs, offering some relief to importers who had faced a sharp spike in costs during the first quarter. However, a May 1 General Rate Increase (GRI) was already on the table, signaling that carriers were not prepared to let rates settle at current levels heading into peak season.

The pattern reflected a recurring dynamic in the ocean freight market: a brief period of rate moderation followed by aggressive carrier attempts to recapture revenue through surcharges and GRIs. Shippers who used the April window to lock in fixed-rate contracts for the 2024-2025 period were in a better position than those waiting for further declines that ultimately did not materialize.

Asian Port Disruptions: Dense Fog

Dense fog at key origin ports — including Shanghai, Ningbo, and Busan — contributed to closures, congestion, and departure delays during the April period. These weather-related disruptions compounded existing schedule reliability issues, pushing vessel arrivals further off published schedules and creating ripple effects through supply chain challenges for importers with time-sensitive cargo.

For shipments caught in port delays, leveraging a supply chain risk management framework helps teams identify alternative departure windows and manage downstream inventory impacts before they become critical.

Panama Canal: Brighter Days Ahead

One of the most consequential developments in April was the Panama Canal Authority’s announcement of a phased return toward normal operations — a development that had wide-ranging implications for trans-Pacific and Atlantic trade routes.

Expanded Daily Transit Allowances

The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) announced that starting in the second half of May, it would allow 31 ships to transit the canal daily, up from 24 ships per day during the first half of May. By the start of June, the number was expected to rise to 32 ships per day. The canal remained restricted to ships with a 44-foot draft, but the expanded slot availability meant more large vessels could resume canal transits rather than taking the costly Cape of Good Hope detour.

The return to higher capacity was contingent on improved rainfall in the Gatun Lake watershed. Forecasts at the time were cautiously optimistic, and the canal’s recovery proved to be an important factor in capacity normalization across several key trade lanes heading into summer.

Fixed-Rate Contract Terms for 2024-2025

For shippers evaluating annual contract commitments with ocean carriers for the 2024-2025 contract year, the following terms were widely applicable to new NAC (Named Account Contract) agreements:

  • MQC (Minimum Quantity Commitment): At least 300 TEU for each NAC
  • Weekly MQC: At least 4 TEU per week on a single port pair
  • Validity: Rates valid from May 1, 2024 through April 30, 2025
  • Bunker surcharges: Inclusive of Q2 bunker costs, backed out at time of filing and floating quarterly per tariff
  • Included surcharges: GRI, DTHC, ACC, Panama Canal surcharge, and Suez Canal surcharge
  • Subject to: ISPS, TSC, Carbon Tax if applicable
  • PSS: Subject to Peak Season Surcharge under mutual agreement
  • Cargo eligibility: General cargo of legal weight only
  • Final approval: Rates subject to carrier’s final approval and contract filing

If you need help evaluating whether a fixed-rate contract or spot market approach is right for your cargo volume profile, our trade advisory services team can model both scenarios. You can also use our tariff calculator to estimate landed costs under different routing assumptions.

Tariff Response Unit

Audit your derivative HTS exposure

Our brokers will review your top 50 derivative HTS lines and flag Section 232 valuation risk before CBP does.

Air Freight: Elevated Rates Persist

The air freight market in April continued to reflect the structural pressures that had kept rates elevated throughout the first quarter of 2024 — well above pre-COVID baselines on most international lanes.

Asia to North America Air Cargo

Air freight rates on Asia-to-North America lanes remained significantly above pre-COVID levels, driven by a combination of factors:

  1. Continued diversion of ocean cargo to air due to Red Sea disruptions adding transit time and cost to sea routes.
  2. Sustained e-commerce demand, particularly from Chinese platforms shipping directly to U.S. consumers.
  3. Tight freighter capacity as belly capacity on passenger routes was insufficient to absorb the volume surge.

For shippers evaluating mode decisions, the calculus between air vs. ocean freight grew more complex in this environment — higher air rates versus longer and less predictable ocean transit times meant total landed cost comparisons required careful, shipment-by-shipment analysis.

Jet Fuel and Middle East Risk Premium

Ongoing conflict in the Middle East posed a direct threat to jet fuel prices, with market participants expecting upward pressure on fuel costs as summer travel season approached. Increased passenger travel in summer typically draws available aviation fuel toward passenger routes, adding further cost pressure to cargo operations.

The disruption to sea freight — particularly in the Red Sea corridor — was simultaneously driving cargo to airlines as shippers sought reliable alternatives. This dual demand pressure (diverted ocean cargo plus structural e-commerce growth) kept air rates elevated even as some analysts had expected seasonal softening.

Geopolitical and Security Developments

April 2024 was marked by significant geopolitical events that had direct implications for global freight markets and route security.

Iran-Israel Escalation

Iran launched a large-scale drone and missile attack against Israel in April, deploying more than 300 drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles in a direct military confrontation. The escalation raised the risk of wider regional conflict, adding to the geopolitical risk premium already embedded in Middle East routing decisions for both sea and air freight. Shippers with cargo moving through or near the Persian Gulf corridor were advised to consult with their forwarders on contingency routing.

MSC Aries Seizure

The MSC Aries container vessel was seized and bound for Iran during this period, a development that rattled container shipping markets. Analysis from Linerlytica noted that less than 2% of containerships active in the Persian Gulf were Israeli-owned, and redeploying those vessels was unlikely to significantly disrupt trade flows on its own — but the signaling effect on insurance premiums and route risk assessments was substantial.

Baltimore Key Bridge Recovery

Recovery at the Port of Baltimore continued following the March 26 Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse. A third temporary channel opened at the collapse site during April, with the Fort Carroll Temporary Alternate Channel providing a controlling depth of 20 feet, 300-foot horizontal clearance, and 135-foot vertical clearance. The progressive reopening of channels allowed increasing volumes to resume at the port ahead of full recovery.

Strategic Outlook: Planning Ahead

The April market environment reinforced several key planning principles for global shippers:

  1. Evaluate fixed contracts now: Rate stabilization windows don’t last long. Locking in annual contracts during softer spot markets provides budget predictability for the year ahead.
  2. Build in route flexibility: The combination of Panama Canal restrictions, Red Sea security threats, and port congestion makes multi-routing contingency planning essential.
  3. Understand your tariff exposure: Geopolitical escalation often precedes trade policy changes. Knowing your Section 232 tariffs and broader tariff exposure positions you to respond quickly.
  4. Monitor de minimis changes: E-commerce shipping dynamics are shifting with proposed changes to the de minimis rule — understanding how these affect your import strategy is increasingly important.
  5. Consolidate where possible: During periods of capacity tightness, a sound freight consolidation guide approach can help smaller volume shippers maintain access to vessel space.

Questions? All you have to do is contact us.

Welcome to our latest Market Watch update, where we delve into the ever-shifting dynamics of sea and air freight. From the intricacies of Asia-to-North America routes to the latest trends in contract negotiations for 2024-2025, we analyze the key developments shaping the industry. As supply and demand economics prevail in sea freight, and air freight rates remain elevated due to disruptions and e-commerce demand, we provide insights into the evolving landscape. Stay tuned as we explore fixed-rate contracts for the coming year and offer recommendations for navigating the complexities of global logistics.

In a market driven by rapid rate swings and geopolitical volatility, having a Control Tower platform with real-time data is no longer a luxury — it is the foundation of a resilient supply chain strategy.

CAPTAIN CONTROL TOWER

Quantify your exposure in 20 minutes

Our trade strategists run your last 90 days of entries through Captain to surface refund eligibility, Section 232 traps and PNTR risk.

EXPLORE CAPTAIN

Ocean Freight: Asia to North America

The first quarter of 2024 set the stage for a complex contract season, with market conditions heavily influenced by the ongoing Red Sea crisis, Panama Canal restrictions, and evolving carrier capacity strategies.

Capacity vs. Demand: A Shifting Balance

Supply and demand economics prevailed through the early months of 2024, as capacity continued to outpace demand while simultaneously accounting for the longer distances and transit times required by Red Sea and Panama Canal detours. The U.S. East Coast showed significantly more available capacity than the West Coast, with some WC voyages reaching full utilization.

Carrier capacity was expected to increase in May to its highest point in 17 months, driven largely by the tonnage impact of vessels rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope — a counterintuitive result where longer voyages effectively removed ships from the available capacity pool, even as new builds entered the market.

These dynamics are a textbook example of the supply chain challenges that global logistics professionals navigate — where headline capacity numbers tell only part of the story, and effective routing and booking strategies determine which shippers get their cargo moved on schedule.

Red Sea Crisis and Routing Implications

The Red Sea disruption continued to be the dominant structural force reshaping global ocean freight in early 2024. Vessels avoiding the Suez Canal and rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope added approximately 10-14 days to transit times on Asia-to-Europe and some Asia-to-U.S. East Coast routes. The capacity absorption effect of these longer voyages was one of the key reasons spot rates remained elevated even as new vessel capacity technically continued to enter the market.

For importers evaluating their supply chain risk management strategies, the Red Sea situation reinforced the value of maintaining multiple carrier relationships and flexible port options rather than relying on a single routing plan.

Contract Season 2024-2025: BCOs Sign at Higher Rates

One of the defining stories of the Q1-Q2 2024 period was the behavior of Beneficial Cargo Owners (BCOs) in the annual contract market — and the terms that defined the 2024-2025 fixed-rate agreements.

BCO Signing Activity and Rate Levels

BCOs began signing carrier contracts at rates 12-17% above the prior year, reflecting the sustained elevation of ocean freight costs relative to the historically low rates of 2023. For many importers, the decision to lock in annual contracts offered budget predictability in exchange for potentially missing out on further spot market softening — a trade-off that made more sense as geopolitical risks kept downside limited.

Use our tariff calculator to model the landed cost impact of rate changes across different trade lanes and product categories.

2024-2025 Fixed-Rate Contract Terms

The following terms were widely applicable to new Named Account Contract (NAC) agreements signed during this period:

  • MQC requirement: At least 300 TEU for each NAC
  • Weekly MQC: At least 4 TEU per week on a single port pair
  • Validity: May 1, 2024 through April 30, 2025
  • Bunker surcharges: Inclusive of Q2 costs, backed out at time of filing, floating quarterly per tariff
  • Included surcharges: GRI, DTHC, ACC, Panama Canal surcharge, and Suez Canal surcharge
  • Conditional surcharges: ISPS, TSC, Carbon Tax if applicable
  • PSS: Subject to mutual agreement
  • Cargo: General cargo of legal weight only
  • Approval: Subject to carrier’s final approval and contract filing

Our trade advisory services team works directly with importers to evaluate contract terms against their volume profiles, commodity mix, and risk tolerance before signing.

Tariff Response Unit

Audit your derivative HTS exposure

Our brokers will review your top 50 derivative HTS lines and flag Section 232 valuation risk before CBP does.

Air Freight: Volume Growth and Elevated Rates

Air cargo markets in early 2024 were characterized by strong year-on-year demand growth and rates that remained well above historical norms — a combination driven by structural e-commerce demand and ocean freight disruptions pushing cargo toward air alternatives.

Strong Volume Growth Continues

Year-on-year global tonnage data showed air cargo volumes up by +8%, with February marking the third consecutive month of double-digit year-on-year demand growth according to data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA). The sustained momentum was driven by:

  1. E-commerce demand: Chinese platforms continuing to ship high volumes of direct-to-consumer goods via air to meet delivery time commitments.
  2. Ocean freight diversion: Shippers unable to secure reliable ocean capacity — or unwilling to absorb the added transit time of Cape of Good Hope rerouting — shifted cargo to air lanes.
  3. Post-pandemic restocking: Retailers accelerating inventory replenishment ahead of peak season added incremental volume across both ocean and air channels.

For shippers evaluating when air makes sense versus ocean, the comparison is never purely about rate — transit time, inventory carrying cost, and product perishability all factor in. Our guide to air vs. ocean freight breaks down the key decision criteria.

Key Industry Developments in the Period

Several significant events shaped freight markets in this period:

  • Trans-Pacific blank sailings reduced: Carriers began blanking fewer trans-Pacific sailings than in the prior two years, as longer Red Sea rerouting voyages continued to absorb capacity that would otherwise be surplus. Capacity on Asia-U.S. trades was set to reach its highest level in 17 months in May.
  • Chinese import restrictions expanding: U.S. Customs and Border Protection was expected to add more Chinese companies to the forced labor import ban list, with compliance implications for importers of affected goods. Understanding Section 301 tariffs and related trade restrictions is essential for affected supply chains.
  • Air cargo volumes surge: IATA’s February data confirmed an 11.9% jump in air cargo volumes year-on-year, reinforcing the structural demand story across the air freight market.
  • USPS air cargo contract awarded: UPS won the dominant air cargo contract for the U.S. Postal Service, replacing FedEx for the first time in more than 20 years — a significant shift in domestic air logistics infrastructure that would influence capacity allocation across the broader market.
  • De minimis crackdown: The U.S. government announced plans to crack down on e-commerce import methods favored by Chinese platforms like Temu and Shein, which had previously allowed low-value shipments to flow into the U.S. with minimal duties and scrutiny. Understanding changes to the de minimis rule is increasingly important for e-commerce shippers and 3PLs managing direct-to-consumer volumes.
  • Baltimore rerouting data: Early data from the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse showed trucks and ships actively rerouting through alternative ports and corridors, with supply chain data providers beginning to map the real-world impact on freight flows and transit times.

Strategic Takeaways for Shippers

The early 2024 market environment contained important lessons for importers, exporters, and logistics managers navigating a structurally more complex supply chain landscape:

  1. Carrier relationships matter: In a market where carriers prioritize higher-paying cargo and BCOs are locking in annual rates, having strong relationships with your forwarder and carrier contacts is a competitive advantage.
  2. Fixed vs. spot requires scenario modeling: The 12-17% premium BCOs paid over prior-year rates sounds high — but against a spot market that could spike significantly higher during peak, fixed rates offered real risk protection.
  3. Understand your trade compliance exposure: The expanding forced labor import ban list and de minimis changes add compliance complexity that goes well beyond freight booking. Consult trade advisory services before issues reach your port of entry.
  4. Use real-time visibility tools: In a market with this much disruption — from Red Sea security threats to port congestion to canal restrictions — the ability to track ocean, air, and land freight in a single dashboard is a genuine operational advantage.
  5. Plan for consolidation opportunities: For shippers without BCO-level volumes, a smart freight consolidation guide strategy can help access better rates and carrier prioritization during tight capacity periods.

Questions? All you have to do is contact us.