That Runs Every Client From One Platform.
Manage freight for all your customers in one multi-tenant system, give each a branded portal, bill each cleanly, and combine warehouse and transport — multi-client operations, client portals, and isolated billing a 3PL runs without one account bleeding into another.
Trusted by leading importers & manufacturers
A TMS for 3PLs is transportation management built for a company that moves freight on behalf of many customers at once. Where a shipper runs one book and a broker runs a two-sided spread, a 3PL runs many clients in parallel, each with its own carriers, rates, service rules, and invoices. Each client's freight is tracked and measured in shipment tracking software, so the visibility a 3PL resells stays scoped to the account it belongs to.
Atlas TMS is multi-tenant at its core. Each client gets its own rate tables, routing rules, and a branded portal, and every shipment is tagged to the client it belongs to, so billing, reporting, and visibility never cross accounts. Rating, load tendering software, tracking, and freight audit all run per client, so a 3PL delivers the full transportation workflow to each customer without standing up a separate system for each one.
Many 3PLs sell warehousing and transportation together, and Atlas is built to combine them. The transport side ties into warehouse management software so a client's inbound receipt, storage, order fulfillment, and outbound freight sit on one timeline and one invoice, rather than a warehouse bill and a freight bill the customer has to reconcile themselves.
Multi-tenant
Clients on one platform
<1 day
To a live demo
24h
Response time
Six functions a 3PL runs in Atlas to operate many client accounts from one platform without them bleeding together.
Set up each customer as a tenant with its own rates and rules.
Load per-client rate cards, markups, and invoicing terms.
Link warehouse, carrier, and client feeds into each tenant.
Turn on branded portals and run live freight per client.
Verify per-client billing, then onboard the next customers.
A 3PL wins by running many clients cleanly on one platform. With per-client portals, isolated billing, and warehouse and transport on one timeline, you add customers without adding systems and every account stays separate.
Atlas turns a multi-client operation from a tangle of spreadsheets and separate tools into one measured, licensable platform.
Atlas connects each client's carriers, systems, and, when you offer it, their warehouse operation, so a customer's freight and inventory move on one platform instead of separate tools per account. Data flows into the right tenant automatically, so a shipment, a receipt, and an invoice all land against the client they belong to.
The transport side links to warehouse management software so inbound, storage, and outbound events share a timeline, and API and EDI connections carry each client's orders, tenders, and tracking both directions without one account's data touching another's.
Multi-tenant isolation is the security backbone of a 3PL platform. Each client's rates, shipments, invoices, and portal are separated at the data layer, so a customer signing into their portal sees only their own freight, and one account can never read or bill against another's.
Role-based access adds a second layer: your operators see across accounts as their job requires, while a client user is scoped to a single tenant. Every action is logged against a user, so the audit trail that reconciles a client's billing also shows exactly who touched which account and when, which matters when a customer audits their statement.
A TMS for 3PLs is transportation management software built for a third-party logistics provider that moves freight on behalf of many customers at once. A shipper runs one book of freight and a broker runs a two-sided spread, but a 3PL runs many client accounts in parallel, each with its own carriers, rates, service rules, and invoices. The software has to keep every client fully separated while letting the 3PL operate them all from one place. Atlas TMS is multi-tenant at its core: each client gets its own rates, routing, portal, and billing, and every shipment is tagged to the client it belongs to. That lets a 3PL deliver the full rating, tendering, tracking, and audit workflow to each customer without standing up a separate system for every account.
Multi-tenant means many clients run on one shared platform while their data stays completely separated. In Atlas, each customer is a tenant with its own rate tables, routing rules, carriers, invoices, and branded portal, and every shipment is tagged to that tenant. A client signing into their portal sees only their own freight, and billing for one account can never draw on another's shipments. For the 3PL, one operator view spans all accounts, so your team works across clients without switching systems, while the underlying separation keeps each customer's rates and volumes private. This is the defining requirement of 3PL software: without true tenant isolation, running dozens of clients on one system risks data bleeding between accounts, which is a trust and compliance problem no 3PL can accept.
Yes. Atlas gives every client a white-label portal in their own branding where they can quote, book, and track their freight and pull their own reports. The portal shows only that client's data, so nothing about your other customers, your buy rates, or your margins is exposed. For your operations team, self-serve portals cut the volume of status calls and booking emails, because customers handle routine work themselves. For your customers, a branded portal makes your service feel like a product they logged into rather than a vendor they email. Turning a portal on for a new client is a configuration step, not a build, so you can offer polished self-serve visibility to every account without developing software for each one.
Each client is billed on their own rate card, markups, and terms, and every charge reconciles only to that client's shipments. Atlas keeps the rates and invoices isolated per tenant, so a customer's statement reflects their freight and nothing else, whether you bill their own contracted carriers at cost plus a management fee or apply your own buy rates at a markup. Because shipments are tagged to the client as they move, invoicing at the end of a cycle is a reconciliation rather than a reconstruction. This matters most when a customer audits their statement: the charges trace back to specific shipments and events on their account. Clean, isolated per-client billing is one of the main reasons a growing 3PL replaces spreadsheets with a real multi-tenant platform.
Yes, and for 3PLs that sell both this is a major reason to run Atlas. The transportation side ties into warehouse management software, so a client's inbound receipt, storage, order fulfillment, and outbound freight sit on one timeline and reconcile to one invoice. The customer gets a single view from dock to delivery rather than a warehouse bill and a freight bill they have to stitch together. Inventory events and shipment events share the same client record, so when an order ships, the stock movement and the freight both post against that account. Offering storage and transport as one combined, reconciled product is a differentiator against providers who bolt two disconnected systems together, and it removes the reconciliation friction that customers dislike most.
Onboarding a client in Atlas is a configuration, not a new implementation. You set the customer up as a tenant, load their rate card, routing rules, and carriers, configure their billing terms, and turn on their branded portal. Because the platform is already running, you are adding an account rather than standing up software, so a straightforward client can be live in days rather than weeks. More complex clients, with warehouse integration, EDI trading partners, or custom billing, take longer because there is more to connect and test, but the pattern is repeatable. That repeatability is the point: once your first few clients are modeled, each additional customer follows the same path, so growth does not mean a fresh project every time you sign a new account.
Yes. Atlas supports both models and keeps them separate. A client can bring their own contracted carriers and negotiated rates, and you operate their freight on those, billing your management fee. Or you can apply your own buy rates and carriers and sell the client a marked-up rate, keeping the spread. Some 3PLs mix both across their book. In every case the rates are isolated per tenant, so one client's pricing is never visible to another, and margin is visible to you by client. Carrier compliance, insurance, and scorecards are tracked per account where the carriers are client-owned, or centrally where they are yours. Keeping client-owned and 3PL-owned rates cleanly separated on one platform is exactly the kind of complexity a purpose-built multi-tenant TMS is meant to handle.
Shipper software manages one company's freight at the lowest cost. Broker software manages a two-sided buy-sell spread. A 3PL TMS manages many client accounts in parallel, which introduces requirements neither of the others needs: true multi-tenant data isolation, per-client portals and branding, per-client rate cards and billing, and often warehousing combined with transport on one client record. A shipper tool has no concept of separating customers because it serves one; a broker tool centers on margin rather than running each shipper's own operation. Atlas offers editions for all three on the same engine, so a 3PL gets the multi-client, multi-tenant workflow while shippers and brokers get theirs, and the shared platform keeps the data model and integrations consistent as your business or your clients cross between roles.
Yes, that separation is built in. Your operations team gets an operator view that spans every client account, so they can work loads, run billing, and manage carriers across your whole book from one place. Client users, by contrast, are scoped to a single tenant and see only their own freight, rates, and reports through their portal. Role-based access decides what each internal user can do as well, so billing, dispatch, and account management can be separated among your staff. Every action is logged against a user, so you can trace who touched which client account and when. This two-level model, operators across accounts and clients locked to their own, is fundamental to a 3PL platform, because your team needs breadth while each customer needs strict isolation.
Each client can receive reporting drawn only from their own shipments: spend by lane and mode, carrier on-time and service scorecards, volume trends, and billing statements, all in your branding and available self-serve through their portal. Because every shipment is tagged to the client and reconciled to their billing, the numbers a customer sees tie back to real freight and real invoices rather than a manually built summary. You also get a 3PL-wide view across all accounts, so you can see total volume, margin by client, and where service is slipping before a customer raises it. Delivering credible, self-serve analytics per client is often what lets a 3PL retain accounts and justify its fees, and here it comes from the same data that runs operations.
The initial platform setup for a 3PL, modeling your first clients, configuring billing, and connecting warehouse and carrier feeds, typically takes four to eight weeks depending on how many clients you start with and how complex their billing and integrations are. After that, each additional client is a configuration that can go live in days rather than a new project, because the platform and the patterns are already in place. We sequence the rollout so your highest-volume or most standard clients go live first, prove the billing and portal flow, and then the rest follow the same path. The usual gate is not the software but the completeness of each client's rate, carrier, and billing data when we load it, which is why onboarding front-loads that validation per account.
Atlas pricing for 3PLs follows how you use the platform rather than one flat figure. Most 3PL programs are priced on a combination of a base platform fee and volume, by client, by shipment, or by spend under management, with warehouse and portal capabilities scoped to what you offer your customers. Because the right structure depends on how many clients you run, whether you combine warehousing, and how you bill each account, we quote after a workflow review rather than from a generic rate card. The comparison that matters is the platform cost against the systems it replaces and the clients you can add without new implementations. The review is built to show that math against your own book before you commit to anything.
Yes. Scaling is the design goal of a multi-tenant 3PL platform. Adding a client is a configuration rather than a new system, so growth does not mean a fresh implementation each time you sign an account. The operator view and reporting span your whole book, so a larger client count does not fragment your team across separate tools. Per-client isolation holds regardless of how many tenants run, so the fiftieth client is as separated as the first. Pricing that follows volume means the platform cost tracks your business rather than forcing a step change. For a 3PL whose growth depends on onboarding customers quickly and cleanly, a platform that turns each new account into a repeatable configuration is the difference between scaling smoothly and rebuilding operations every year.
Yes. Multi-tenant isolation separates each client's rates, shipments, invoices, and portal at the data layer, so one account can never read or bill against another's, and a client user only ever sees their own freight. Data is encrypted, and role-based access controls what your own staff can do, so account management, billing, and dispatch can be separated among your team. Every action is logged against a user, so the same audit trail that reconciles a client's billing also shows who touched which account and when. For a 3PL, this is not an optional feature: your customers are trusting you to keep their freight, rates, and volumes private from each other, and the platform is built so that separation holds by default rather than depending on your team never making a mistake.
